NEWS
NEWS

New Upheaval in Global Shipping: Decoding HMM's $17 Billion Capacity Expansion Battle

Release time:

2025-04-28

When 90% of global trade relies on shipping, the size of a container fleet becomes a company's most critical asset. After three years of extreme market swings, South Korea's flagship carrier HMM announced a groundbreaking "capacity doubling plan" in June 2024. The company aims to invest $17 billion to expand its fleet from 920,000 TEU to 1.55 million TEU by 2030. This bold move, called a "bet of the century" by industry experts, could reshape global supply chains and redefine the competitive landscape of shipping that has lasted for three decades.  

一、Strategic Plan: A Three-Layer Approach to Fleet Growth  

As South Korea’s only top-10 global shipping company, HMM’s expansion strategy is carefully designed:  

1. Scaling Up Step-by-Step 

- Current capacity: 920,240 TEU (60% owned ships)  

- Targets: 1.2 million TEU by 2025 → 1.4 million by 2027 → 1.55 million by 2030  

- Methods: 55% new builds ($3.4 billion/year), 25% leased ships, 20% secondhand purchases  

2. Technology Upgrades  

- Green ships get 60% of funds ($10.2 billion)  

- Building 20 LNG dual-fuel ships (24,000 TEU each) with Hyundai Heavy Industries  

- Developing the world’s first ammonia-powered 10,000-TEU ship with Daewoo Shipbuilding  

- Investing $1.5 billion in digital fleet management systems  

3. Network Improvements  

- North America route capacity to rise from 280,000 to 450,000 TEU  

- European route mega-ships to increase from 35% to 60%  

- Opening 6 new routes in emerging markets (India-West Africa, South America East Coast)  

二、Competition: Three Hurdles to Join the "Million TEU Club 

In shipping, reaching 1 million TEU isn’t just about size—it’s about real power:  

1.. Cost Efficiency  

- Unit costs drop 18-22% when fleet hits 1.2 million TEU  

- Membership in top alliances (like 2M) requires 1 million TEU  

- Big fleets get better port deals and priority docking  

2. Tech Advantages  

- Daily fuel cost: $28,000 (traditional ships) vs. $21,000 (LNG ships)  

- Ammonia ships may cut costs to $16,000/day by 2030  

3. Route Coverage  

- Key routes need 7 weekly sailings to keep customers  

- Secondary routes break even at 3 weekly sailings  

- New routes take 3-5 years to become profitable  

三、National Strategy: South Korea’s Full Support  

HMM’s plan is part of South Korea’s 2025-2030 shipping revival plan:  

1. Shipbuilding Partnership  

- Hyundai and Samsung shipbuilders cut delivery time to 18 months (vs. 24-month average)  

- Government loans at 2.1% interest (half of market rates)  

2. Port Upgrades  

- $2.7 billion for Busan’s automated port (handling 4.5 million TEU/year)  

- Gwangyang Port to become Asia’s LNG refueling hub  

3. Digital Systems  

- Blockchain platform with Samsung SDS to manage 60% of trade documents  

- Smart containers to rise from 12% to 45% by 2030  

四、Risks: Three Big Challenges  

Despite the ambitious plan, HMM must manage these risks: 

1. Timing Mismatch  

- New ships take 3-5 years to build, but market cycles last 7-10 years  

- Solution: Keep 30% of fleet as short-term leases  

2. Green Costs  

- LNG ships cost 40% more to build, but carbon tax savings won’t come until 2030  

- Compromise: Design ships that can switch fuels later  

3. Geopolitical Dangers  

- Red Sea crisis raised Asia-Europe route costs by 35%  

- Plan: Team up with Hyundai Merchant Marine for security  

五、Industry Insight  

Drewry analysts note: "HMM’s move is about survival. When Maersk buys logistics firms and CMA CGM invests in e-commerce, just having big ships isn’t enough. But reaching 1.55 million TEU gives HMM a seat at the next industry shakeup table." Notably, HMM set aside $5 billion for mergers, hinting it might copy Mediterranean Shipping’s acquisition strategy.  

As Hyundai Heavy Industries lays the keel for its first 24,000-TEU ship, South Korea’s shipping future hangs in the balance. In a changing global trade world, HMM’s success or failure could redraw Northeast Asia’s role in maritime power.

Previous

Next

Previous

Next